4.4 Article

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics of 111In-Labeled VNB-PEGylated Liposomes After Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Administration in a Tumor/Ascites Mouse Model

Journal

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 453-460

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2008.0572

Keywords

ascites; C26/tk-luc tumor; indium-111; micro-PET; PEGylated liposomes

Funding

  1. National Health Research Institutes (Miaoli, Taiwan, ROC) [96A1-NMPP01-007, 97A1-NMPP01-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoliposomes are important drug carriers that can passively target tumor sites by the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in neoplasm lesions. This study evaluated the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of In-111-labeled vinorelbine (VNB)-encapsulated PEGylated liposomes (IVNBPL) after intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration in a C26/tk-luc colon carcinoma ascites mouse model. IVNBPL was prepared by labeling VNB-encapsulated PEGylated liposomes with In-111-oxine. BALB/c mice were i.p. inoculated with 2x10(5) C26/tk-luc cells in 500 mu L of phosphate-buffered saline. Peritoneal tumor lesions were confirmed by I-124-FIAU/micro-PET (positron emission tomography) and bioluminescence imaging. Ascites production was examined by ultrasound imaging on day 10 after tumor cell inoculation. The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution studies of IVNBPL in a tumor/ascites mouse model were conducted. The labeling efficiency was more than 90%. The in vitro stability in human plasma at 37 degrees C for 72 hours was 83% +/- 3.5%. For i.p. administration, the areas under curves (AUCs) of ascites and tumor were 6.78- and 1.70-fold higher, whereas the AUCs of normal tissues were lower than those via the i.v. route. This study demonstrates that i.p. administration is a better approach than i.v. injection for IVNBPL, when applied to the treatment of i.p. malignant disease in a tumor/ascites mouse model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available