4.6 Article

Kinetic model for sintering of supported metal particles with improved size-dependent energetics and applications to Au on TiO2(110)

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.035430

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A kinetic model for the sintering of metal particles on oxide or other support surfaces is derived and applied to simulate experimental measurements of the sintering of a model gold catalyst: gold nanoparticles supported on TiO2 (110). It follows the pioneering work of Wynblatt and Gjostein (WG), Progress in Solid State Chemistry (1975, p. 21), but removes several important assumptions that create dramatic errors in sintering rates for particles smaller than 6 nm in diameter, including (1) use of the Gibbs-Thomson relation assuming that the surface free energy of metal particles is independent of size, and (2) neglect of all but the first-order terms in a Taylor series expansion. Recent microcalorimetry measurements have shown these assumptions to be untrue in that metal particles smaller than 6 nm have much higher surface free energies than large particles. A modified bond-additivity model more accurately estimates particle energy versus size. This estimate was incorporated into the kinetic model of WG and applied to simulate the sintering of Au particles on TiO2 (110) as measured by temperature-programmed low-energy ion scattering. Our model reproduces well the broad temperature range over which sintering typically occurs in such experiments. This is analogous to accurate modeling of long-term sintering kinetics of metal nanoparticles under the isothermal conditions of real catalysis. These results also highlight problems with classical methods for determining the sintering mechanism based solely upon the shape of the sintered particle-size distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available