4.7 Review

Conditions for the cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083504

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We derive the conditions under which dark energy models whose Lagrangian densities f are written in terms of the Ricci scalar R are cosmologically viable. We show that the cosmological behavior of f(R) models can be understood by a geometrical approach consisting of studying the m(r) curve on the (r,m) plane, where m equivalent to Rf(,RR)/f(,R) and r equivalent to -Rf(,R)/f with f(,R)equivalent to df/dR. This allows us to classify the f(R) models into four general classes, depending on the existence of a standard matter epoch and on the final accelerated stage. The existence of a viable matter-dominated epoch prior to a late-time acceleration requires that the variable m satisfies the conditions m(r) approximate to + 0 and dm/dr > -1 at r approximate to -1. For the existence of a viable late-time acceleration we require instead either (i) m = -r -1, (root 3 -1 ) /2 < m <= 1 and dm/dr < - 1 or (ii) 0 < m <= 1 at r = -2. These conditions identify two regions in the (r,m) space, one for the matter era and the other for the acceleration. Only models with an m(r) curve that connects these regions and satisfies the requirements above lead to an acceptable cosmology. The models of type f(R)= alpha R-n and f = R+alpha R-n do not satisfy these conditions for any n > 0 and n < -1 and are thus cosmologically unacceptable. Similar conclusions can be reached for many other examples discussed in the text. In most cases the standard matter era is replaced by a cosmic expansion with scale factor a proportional to t(1/2). We also find that f(R) models can have a strongly phantom attractor but in this case there is no acceptable matter era.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available