4.5 Article

Immune modulation with weekly dosing of an agonist CD40 antibody in a phase I study of patients with advanced solid tumors

Journal

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 983-993

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.10.10.13251

Keywords

CD40; immunotherapy; antibody; T cell; B cell

Categories

Funding

  1. Pfizer, Inc
  2. NIH [P50 CA093372]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Single-dose infusion of the agonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb) CP-870,893 accomplishes immune activation and clinical responses in patients with advanced cancers, but repeat dosing of this agent has not been reported. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. The most common adverse event was transient, infusion-related cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 CRS and grade 3 urticaria; the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was estimated to be 0.2 mg/kg. Seven patients (26%) had stable disease as the best clinical response; no partial or complete responses were observed. At the MTD, patient B lymphocytes exhibited persistently increased expression of costimulatory and adhesion molecules without resetting to baseline between doses. In 4 of 8 patients (50%) evaluated at the MTD, there were marked declines in total CD3(+) T lymphocytes, as well as CD4(+) and CD8(+) subsets. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies received weekly intravenous infusions of CP-870,893 in four dose level cohorts. Safety and immune pharmacodynamics were assessed. Conclusions: Weekly infusions of the agonist CD40 antibody CP-870,893 were well-tolerated, but there was little clinical activity in advanced cancer patients. Correlative studies demonstrate chronic B cell activation and in some patients, T cell depletion. Longer dosing intervals may be desirable for optimal immune pharmacodynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available