4.6 Article

A diagram to determine the evaporation status of extrasolar planets

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 461, Issue 3, Pages 1185-U115

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065014

Keywords

stars : planetary systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. To describe the evaporation status of extrasolar planets, we consider an energy diagram in which the potential energy of the planets is plotted versus the energy received by the upper atmosphere. Methods. Here we present a basic method to estimate these quantities. For the potential energy, we include the modification of the gravity field by the tidal forces from the parent stars. Results. This description allows a rapid estimate of both the escape rate of the atmospheric gas and the lifetime of a planet against the evaporation process. In the energy diagram, we find an evaporation-forbidden region in which a gaseous planet would evaporate in less than 5 billion years. With their observed characteristics, all extrasolar planets are found outside this evaporation-forbidden region. The escape rates are estimated to be in the range 10(5) g s(-1) to 10(12) g s(-1), with a few cases above 10(11) g s(-1). The estimated escape rate for HD209458 b is consistent with the lower limit of 10(10) g s(-1) obtained from interpretation of the HI Lyman-alpha observations. This diagram suggests possibilities for the nature of the recently discovered Neptune-mass planets. We find that GJ 436 b, 55 Cnc e and HD69830 b cannot be low mass gaseous planets. With a density that must be above 0.5 g cm(-3) to survive evaporation, these planets must contain a large fraction of solid/liquid material. We find that GJ 876 d must have a density greater than similar to 3 gcm(-3) to survive the strong EUV energy flux from its nearby parent star. GJ 876 d must contain a large fraction of massive elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available