3.8 Article

Phase I/II feasibility study evaluating the generation of leukemia-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte lines for treatment of patients with relapsed leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Journal

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 72-80

Publisher

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.10433

Keywords

cellular immunotherapy; CTL; leukemia; allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives Graft-versus-host-disease may be avoided and the likelihood of a graft-versus-leukemia reaction increased by infusion of in vitro-gene rated, leukemia-reactive, cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) lines as treatment for patients with relapsed leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, instead of donor lymphocyte infusion. The aim of this phase I/II study was to assess the feasibility of large-scale in vitro generation of leukemia-reactive CTL for clinical use. Design and Methods Using a modified limiting dilution culture system donor T cells were stimulated with HLA-identical leukemic antigen-presenting cells. Feasibility experiments demonstrated that in 16 of 27 donor-recipient pairs tested a CTL line could be generated. Twelve of these 16 patients developed a relapse and for 11 of these 12 patients a CTL line was generated under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. Results The CTL lines showed moderate to high cytotoxic activity against original recipient leukemic cells in vitro. Eight patients with a relapse received from one to seven CTL lines. One patient entered a complete remission after CTL infusion only, one entered a complete remission after combined CTL infusion and donor lymphocyte infusion, two patients had temporarily stable disease, and in four patients no response was observed. Interpretation and Conclusions Although the current procedure to generate these CTL lines is feasible, the strategy is logistically complex and time-consuming, and needs further improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available