4.7 Article

The prelude to and aftermath of the giant flare of 2004 December 27: Persistent and pulsed X-ray properties of SGR 1806-20 from 1993 to 2005

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 654, Issue 1, Pages 470-486

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/507459

Keywords

pulsars : individual (SGR 1806-20); X-rays : bursts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the evolution of key spectral and temporal parameters of SGR 1806 - 20 prior to and following the highly energetic giant flare of 2004 December 27. Using RXTE, we track the pulse frequency of the SGR and find that the spin-down rate varied erratically in the months before and after the flare. Contrary to the giant flare in SGR 1900+14, we find no evidence for a discrete jump in spin frequency at the time of the December 27th flare (\Delta nu/nu\ < 5 x 10(-6)). In the months surrounding the flare, we find a strong correlation between pulsed flux and torque consistent with the model for magnetar magnetosphere electrodynamics proposed by Thompson et al. As with the flare in SGR 1900+14, the pulse morphology of SGR 1806 - 20 changes drastically following the flare. Using Chandra and other publicly available imaging X-ray detector observations, we construct a spectral history of SGR 1806 - 20 from 1993 to 2005. The usual magnetar persistent emission spectral model of a power law plus a blackbody provides an excellent fit to the data. We confirm the earlier finding byMereghetti et al. of increasing spectral hardness of SGR 1806 - 20 between 1993 and 2004. However, our results indicate significant differences in the temporal evolution of the spectral hardening. Rather than a direct correlation between torque and spectral hardness, we find evidence for a sudden torque change that preceded a gradual hardening of the energy spectrum on a timescale of years. Interestingly, the spectral hardness, spin-down rate, phase-averaged flux, and pulsed flux of SGR 1806 - 20 all peak months before the flare epoch.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available