4.5 Review

Mouse models of prostate cancer: picking the best model for the question

Journal

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
Volume 33, Issue 2-3, Pages 377-397

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-013-9487-8

Keywords

Mouse models; Prostate cancer; TRAMP; LADY; PTEN; Myc

Categories

Funding

  1. VUMC Integrated Biological Systems Training in Oncology training grant [2 T32 CA119925-06, 1 T32 CA119925]
  2. NIH Pathway to Independence Award [1 K99 CA172122]
  3. VUMC Multidisciplinary Training Grant in Molecular Endocrinology [5 T32 DK007563-21]
  4. American Cancer Society Great Lakes Division-Michigan Cancer Research Fund Postdoctoral Fellowship
  5. Department of Defense (DOD) [PC111074]
  6. DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-10-1-0236]
  7. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities grants [MD 5 R01 004038, G12 MD 007586, 5 U54 CA 163069]
  8. NCI [U01 CA141582, R01-CA076142-14]
  9. UC Davis Extension Genomic Pathology online course in Pathobiology of the Mouse
  10. NIDDK [R01-DK055748-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When the National Institutes of Health Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium initiated the Prostate Steering Committee 15 years ago, there were no genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models of prostate cancer (PCa). Today, a PubMed search for prostate cancer mouse model yields 3,200 publications and this list continues to grow. The first generation of GEM utilized the newly discovered and characterized probasin promoter driving viral oncogenes such as Simian virus 40 large T antigen to yield the LADY and TRAMP models. As the PCa research field has matured, the second generation of models has incorporated the single and multiple molecular changes observed in human disease, such as loss of PTEN and overexpression of Myc. Application of these models has revealed that mice are particularly resistant to developing invasive PCa, and once they achieve invasive disease, the PCa rarely resembles human disease. Nevertheless, these models and their application have provided vital information on human PCa progression. The aim of this review is to provide a brief primer on mouse and human prostate histology and pathology, provide descriptions of mouse models, as well as attempt to answer the age old question: Which GEM model of PCa is the best for my research question?.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available