4.7 Article

Seed size and the evolution of leaf defences

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages 1057-1068

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12407

Keywords

fracture toughness; herbivory; plant development and life-history traits; seed dispersal; spatial aggregation

Funding

  1. Explorer's Club
  2. National Geographic Society [6584-99, 7179-01]
  3. National Institutes of Health [5F32GM064287]
  4. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [7241/97M]
  5. Sigma Xi
  6. Frank Levinson Fund
  7. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
  8. NSF [BCS-0923791]
  9. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NSF) [EF-0905606]
  10. Division Of Environmental Biology
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [1122634] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaf defences vary widely among tree species, affecting rates of herbivory, survival and reproduction. Two contrasting hypotheses account for variation in leaf defences among species. The first predicts that a slow life history, which is characteristic of larger seeded species adapted to resource-limited environments, is associated with well-defended leaves. The second, apparency theory, predicts that elevated leaf defences are necessitated for species that are more detectable to herbivores. Here we use comparative methods and a global data set to test (i) the relationship between seed size and leaf defences and (ii) the relationship between clumping (spatial apparency) and leaf defences. We found that seed size was positively related to leaf fracture toughness, but not phenolics or tannin concentration and that spatial aggregation was unrelated to leaf defences.Synthesis. Our results suggest that larger seed size and increased leaf toughness are correlated as part of a trait syndrome associated with a slow, resource-limited life history, not clumped dispersion and increased spatial apparency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available