4.7 Review

Bevacizumab and Glioblastoma: Scientific Review, Newly Reported Updates, and Ongoing Controversies

Journal

CANCER
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages 997-1007

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28935

Keywords

glioblastoma; bevacizumab; angiogenesis; vascular endothelial growth factor; malignant glioma

Categories

Funding

  1. Roche
  2. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  3. Genentech
  4. Genentech/Roche
  5. EMD Serono
  6. Merck/Schering
  7. Novartis
  8. Amgen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anti-angiogenic therapy for glioblastoma has been in the spotlight for several years, as researchers and clinicians strive to find agents with meaningful efficacy against glioblastoma. Bevacizumab in particular, in the second half of the last decade, became the most significant breakthrough in anti-glioblastoma therapy since temozolomide. Optimism for bevacizumab has been somewhat challenged given recent clinical trials that have raised questions regarding its clinical effectiveness, the optimal timing of its use and the validity of endpoints, among other issues. In addition, uncertainty has recently arisen regarding the effects of bevacizumab on quality of life and neurocognitive function, two key clinical endpoints of unquestionable significance among glioblastoma patients. In this review, we highlight these controversies and other recent work related to bevacizumab for glioblastoma. Cancer 2015;121:997-1007. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. Bevacizumab provides benefit for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The results of recent trials have indicated that its role among newly diagnosed patients remains unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available