4.8 Article

X inactive-specific transcript RNA coating and genetic instability of the X chromosome in BRCA1 breast tumors

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages 5134-5140

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0465

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification among breast tumors of those arising in a hereditary BRCA1 context remains a medical challenge. Abnormalities in X chromosome copy number and in the epigenetic stability of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) have been proposed to characterize BRCA1 breast tumors. In particular, it has been proposed that loss of BRCA1 function can lead to loss of X inactive-specific transcript (MST) RNA association with the Xi. However, few studies have addressed this issue in a sufficiently large series of BRCA.1 primary tumors. Here we assess X-chromosome status using single-cell (RNA and DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization) and global genomic (array-comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping) approaches on a series of 11 well-defined BRCA-1 tumors. We show that many or most cells of the tumors contain one or more XIST RNA domains. Furthermore, the number of XIST RNA domains per cell varied considerably even within a single tumor. Frequent X-chromosome allelic and copy number aberrations were found, in agreement with aberrant XIST RNA domain numbers. In summary, by combining multiple approaches to assess the genetics and epigenetics of a large series of BRCA1 primary tumors, we can conclude definitively that BRCAl is not required for XIST RNA coating of the X chromosome. The intraturnoral and intertumoral variability in XIST RNA domain number in BRCA1 tumors correlates with chromosomal genetic abnormalities, including gains, losses, reduplications, and rearrangements of the X-chromosome. Finally, we also show the necessity for combined global and single-cell approaches in the assessment of tumors with such a high degree of heterogeneity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available