4.6 Article

Intrahepatic insulin resistance in a murine model of steatohepatitis: effect of PPAR gamma agonist pioglitazone

Journal

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 56-65

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700489

Keywords

nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; hepatic insulin resistance; pioglitazone; PPARgamma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatic insulin resistance is associated with hepatic steatosis and is thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of steatohepatitis. Using a murine model of steatohepatitis (mice fed a diet deficient in methionine and choline-MCD diet), we tested the effects of the insulin-sensitising, PPARc agonist drug pioglitazone (PGZ) on systemic and intrahepatic insulin sensitivity and on liver pathology. Compared to controls, mice fed the MCD diet develop a significant steatohepatitis, have enhanced glucose tolerance and enhanced systemic response to insulin. PGZ did not affect the systemic insulin sensitivity in control or MCD-fed mice as assessed in vivo by intraperitoneal glucose or insulin dynamic tests. However, PGZ prevented hepatic fat accumulation and steatohepatitis induced by the MCD diet. This effect was associated with an increased mass of adipose tissue and increased expression and release of adiponectin, while hepatic acyl co-enzyme A oxidase and acyl-coenzyme A carboxylase, regulating hepatic beta-oxidation of fatty acid, remained unchanged. Steatohepatitis in MCD-diet-fed mice was associated with intrahepatic insulin resistance as shown by a reduced phosphorylation of hepatic insulin receptor, and Akt in response to an insulin stimulus. PGZ to MCD-fed mice restored the activation of the insulin receptor and of the Akt pathway in response to insulin. In conclusion, PGZ alleviates steatosis and steatohepatitis induced by the MCD diet, an effect associated with correction of intrahepatic insulin resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available