4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Markers predicting clinical benefit in breast cancer from microtubule-targeting agents

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 15-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm534

Keywords

breast cancer; epothilone; ixabepilone; taxane; microtubule-targeting agents; tubulin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taxanes (e.g. paclitaxel, docetaxel) and epothilones (e.g. ixabepilone) are microtubule-targeting agents, which disrupt cellular processes and induce apoptosis. Although their mechanisms of action are similar, clinical data in breast cancer patients support at least partial non-cross resistance between the classes, and even between individual compounds. Several biomarkers might contribute to the identification of patient groups likely to derive benefit from one class of microtubule-targeting agent or even one agent. Overexpression of P-glycoprotein is associated with resistance to taxanes, but not ixabepilone, in vitro; its role in vivo remains unclear. Mutations in beta-tubulin linked to resistance to taxanes but not epothilones are observed in vitro; somatic mutations of beta-tubulin appear rare clinically. Overexpression of the Pill-tubulin isoform is associated with taxane resistance in cell lines; some clinical studies support a relationship between poor response to taxanes and overexpression of beta III-tubulin. beta III-tubulin overexpression seems not to affect sensitivity to ixabepilone [1]. Estrogen receptor negativity, low expression of microtubule-associated protein tau, and perhaps HER2 amplification may define a subset of patients with higher than average sensitivity to paclitaxel. Large scale pharmacogenomic analysis has identified molecular markers potentially capable of distinguishing patients with differential sensitivity to paclitaxel and ixabepilone. These markers require validation in clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available