Journal
CANCER
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages 1664-1674Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26478
Keywords
disparities; employment; breast cancer; survivorship
Categories
Funding
- American Cancer Society [TURSG-02-081]
- California Breast Cancer Research Program [7PB-0070]
- National Cancer Institute [1R01CA119197-01A1]
- American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Anne Moore Breast Cancer Research Fund
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND: Previous research has found an 80% return-to-work rate in mid-income white breast cancer survivors, but little is known about the employment trajectory of low-income minorities or whites. We set out to compare the trajectories of low-income Latina and non-Latina white survivors and to identify correlates of employment status. METHODS: Participants were low-income women who had localized breast cancer, spoke English or Spanish, and were employed at the time of diagnosis. Interviews were conducted 6, 18, and 36 months after diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent correlates of employment status at 18 months. RESULTS: Of 290 participants, 62% were Latina. Latinas were less likely than non-Latina whites to be working 6 months ( 27% vs 49%; P.0002) and 18 months ( 45% vs 59%; P.02) after diagnosis, but at 36 months there was no significant difference ( 53% vs 59%; P.29). Latinas were more likely to be manual laborers than were non-Latina whites ( P <.0001). Baseline job type and receipt of axillary node dissection were associated with employment status among Latinas but not non-Latina whites. CONCLUSIONS: Neither low-income Latinas nor non-Latina whites approached the 80% rate of return to work seen in wealthier white populations. Latinas followed a protracted return-to-work trajectory compared to non-Latina whites, and differences in job type appear to have played an important role. Manual laborers may be disproportionately impacted by surgical procedures that limit physical activity. This can inform the development of rehabilitative interventions and may have important implications for the surgical and postsurgical management of patients. Cancer 2012; 118: 1664-74. VC 2011 American Cancer Society.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available