4.7 Article

The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on cancer-specific survival A Follow-Up Study in Sweden

Journal

CANCER
Volume 118, Issue 5, Pages 1353-1361

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26420

Keywords

cancer-specific survival; national database; TNM classification; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have suggested that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) alters the risk of developing a variety of cancers, but little has been known about the impact of T2DM on cancer prognosis. On the basis of nationwide population-based Swedish registries, the authors of this report compared the cause-specific survival among cancer patients with and without T2DM. METHODS: Patients with T2DM were identified from the nationwide Swedish Hospital Discharge Register, and cancers were recorded from the Swedish Cancer Registry. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression models to compare variations in cause-specific survival between cancer patients with and without T2DM. RESULTS: Of the 1016,105 cancer patients, 16,123 had been hospitalized with T2DM before their diagnosis of cancer. The mortality rate was significantly higher among cancer patients with T2DM than among those without T2DM (cause-specific HR, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.41). There were no differences in TNM stage distribution among cancer patients with or without T2DM for the main cancers, with an exception of tumor and metastatic classifications for breast cancer and prostate cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that patients with T2DM who are diagnosed with a subsequent cancer are at an increased risk for cause-specific mortality compared with patients who have cancer without T2DM. Cancer 2012; 118: 1353-61. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available