4.5 Review

Does autologous transplantation directly increase the risk of secondary leukemia in lymphoma patients?

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 59-70

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705547

Keywords

autologous stem cell transplantation; lymphoma; acute myeloid leukemia; myelodysplasia

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA101937] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA101937] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation ( ASCT) for lymphoma have a significant risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia (t-AML/MDS). Compared to that seen in other indications such as breast cancer, multiple myeloma or germ cell tumors, there is a substantially increased risk for t-AML/MDS following ASCT for lymphoma. This risk has largely been attributed to the extent of pre-transplant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In many of the larger series to date, it has not been possible to directly implicate autologous transplantation itself as a risk factor for t-AML/MDS. Although pre-transplant therapy is certainly an important factor in the development of t-AML/MDS, specific components of the autologous transplantation procedure itself may also contribute to the risk of t-AML/MDS. Specifically, priming chemotherapy, total body irradiation, and the extensive cellular proliferation which occurs during engraftment may all play a role in the development of t-AML/MDS. Furthermore, there is an increasing body of evidence that certain inherited polymorphisms in genes governing drug metabolism, DNA repair and leukemogenesis may influence susceptibility to t-AML/MDS. In this paper, we review the evidence implicating the above risk factors for t-AML/MDS, present a potential mechanism for t-AML/MDS and propose interventions to reduce the rate of t-AML/MDS in lymphoma patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available