4.7 Article

Novelty seeking involved in mediating the association between the dopamine D4 receptor gene exon III polymorphism and heavy drinking in male adolescents: results from a high-risk community sample

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 87-92

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.025

Keywords

dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4); drinking; novelty seeking; adolescence; genetics; substance use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous research suggests that personality traits, particularly novelty seeking (NS), increase the risk of substance abuse. One possible explanation to account for this association relates to common genetic factors. The aim of this study was to examine whether allelic variants of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) are associated with alcohol use in adolescents and to determine the extent to which these links are mediated by NS. Methods: Three hundred three adolescents (144 male participants, 159,female participants, approximately 15 years old) from a high-risk community sample completed self-report questionnaires measuring alcohol intake and temperament (Junior Temperament and Character inventory [JTCI]). DNA was genotyped for the DRD4 exon III polymorphism. Results. Male participants carrying the 7-repeat allele of DRD4 drank higher maximum amounts of alcohol per occasion and had greater lifetime rates of heavy drinking than male participants without this allele. Higher levels of NS were associated with higher alcohol intake in both genders. Multiple regression analyses support the role of NS in mediating the relationship between DRD4 and heavy drinking in male adolescents but not in female adolescents. Conclusions: These findings extend previous work highlighting the significance of personality traits as a mediating factor between genetic susceptibility and substance use during the period of early experimental use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available