4.7 Article

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Outcomes for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Stratified by p16 Status

Journal

CANCER
Volume 116, Issue 11, Pages 2645-2654

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25040

Keywords

intensity-modulated radiotherapy; human papillomavirus; p16; oropharyngeal cancer; neck dissection

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were stratified by p16 status, neck dissection, and chemotherapy to correlate these factors with outcomes. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with OPSCC treated with IMRT from 2002 to 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received PT to 66-70 Gray. Forty-five of the tumors were p16 positive (p16+), 27 were p16 negative (p16-), and 41 had unknown p16 status. Sixty-two patients had postradiation neck dissections. Nine patients with p16- tumors and 28 patients with p16+ tumors received chemotherapy. The distribution of T, N, and stage grouping among the p16+ and p16- patients was not significantly different, and 87.5% patients had stage III/IV disease. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 26.3 months. For patients with p16+ tumors, p16- tumors, and the overall cohort, the actuarial 3-year locoregional progression-free survival rate was 97.8%, 73.5%, and 90.5% respectively (P = .006) and the disease-free survival rate was 88.2%, 61.4%, and 81.7%, respectively (P = .004). Patients with p16+ tumors had an 89.5% and 87.5% pathologic complete response (CR) on neck dissection with and without chemotherapy, respectively. In contrast, patients with p16- tumors had a 66.7% and 25.0% pathologic CR on neck dissection with and without chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, p16 status was found to be a significant predictive biomarker and patients with p16+ tumors had much better outcomes than patients with p16- tumors. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether less intense therapy is appropriate for selected patients with p16+ OPSCC, whereas more aggressive strategies are needed to improve outcomes in patients with p16- disease. Cancer 2010;116:2645-54. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available