4.2 Article

Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Chagas antibody in US blood donors

Journal

TRANSFUSION
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 90-96

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01068.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HB-47174] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease, caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, represents a serious blood safety problem due to increasing immigration from Latin America. The Food and Drug Administration recently recommended implementation of Chagas antibody screening for US donors as soon as a suitable assay is licensed. An anonymized preclinical study of a prototype T. cruzi lysate-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics was conducted. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two populations of specimens were evaluated: 1) 10,192 sequential donations from blood donors residing in the El Paso, Texas, area and 2) 178 specimens from South America which were presumptively positive for antibodies to T. cruzi and purchased from commercial vendors. RESULTS: A total of 10,189 (99.97%) of the 10,192 screened donor specimens did not react, whereas 3 (0.03%) tested initially reactive. The 3 initially reactive specimens tested repeat reactive and were confirmed by radioimmunoprecipitation analysis (RIPA). Based on antibody profile analysis, 2 of the 3 Chagas-positive specimens were from the same donor. Observed specificity of the test was therefore 100 percent. Of the specimens from South America, 173 of 178 were reactive by the prototype ELISA. Of the 5 nonreactive specimens, all did not react by indirect fluorescence assay, but 4 were positive by RIPA. Therefore, calculated sensitivity of the ELISA was 97.7 percent (173/177). CONCLUSIONS: These studies indicate that the prototype ELISA has excellent sensitivity and specificity for detection of antibodies to T. cruzi in donors. Moreover, among donations from a geographically selected collection region of the United States, observed seroprevalence was 0.03 percent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available