4.7 Article

[F-18]-Fluorodeoxy-D-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography Response Is Associated With Outcome for Extremity Osteosarcoma in Children and Young Adults

Journal

CANCER
Volume 115, Issue 15, Pages 3519-3525

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24421

Keywords

osteosarcoma; fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; outcome

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [CA87721, CA65537]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is I of the most powerful prognostic factors for extremity osteosarcoma. [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a non-invasive imaging modality that is used to predict histopathologic response. To determine the prognostic value of FDG-PET response for progression-free survival (PFS) in osteosarcoma, the authors of this report reviewed the University of Washington Medical Center experience. METHODS: Forty patients with extremity osteosarcoma were evaluated by FDG-PET. All patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. FDG-PET standard uptake values (SUVs) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SUV1) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SUV2) were analyzed and correlated with histopathologic response. RESULTS: The median SUV1 was 6.8 (range, 3.0-24.1), the median SUV2 was 2.3 (range, 1.2-12.8), and the median SUV2 to SUV1 ratio (SUV2:1), was 0.36 (range, 0.12-1.10). A good FDG-PET response was defined as an SUV2 <2.5 or an SUV2:1 <= 0.5. FDG-PET responses according to SUV2 and SUV2:1 were concordant with histologic response in 58% and 68% of patients, respectively. SUV2 was associated with outcome (4-year PFS, 73% for SUV2 <2.5 vs 39% for SUV2 >= 2.5; P = .021). Both the initial disease stage and the histologic response were associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET imaging of extremity osteosarcoma was correlated only partially with a histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An SUV2 <2.5 was associated with improved PFS. Future prospective studies are warranted to determine whether FDG-PET imaging may be used as a predictor of outcome independent of initial disease stage. Cancer 2009;115:3519-25. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available