4.7 Article

Combined Androgen Blockade With Bicalutamide for Advanced Prostate Cancer Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized Study for Survival

Journal

CANCER
Volume 115, Issue 15, Pages 3437-3445

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24395

Keywords

prostate cancer; survival; combined androgen blockade; bicalutamide; luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist; clinical trial; immediate combined androgen blockade; deferred combined androgen blockade

Categories

Funding

  1. Advanced Clinical Research Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: A previously reported, double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase 3 trial in 205 patients with stage C/D prostate cancer compared combined androgen blockade (CAB) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) plus bicalutamide 80 mg versus LHRH-A plus bicalutamide-matching placebo (LHRH-A monotherapy). The analysis at a median follow-up of 2.4 years indicated that CAB significantly (P < .001) prolonged the time to progression and the time to treatment failure. In the current report, survival data from a long-term follow-up (median, 5.2 years) were analyzed. METHODS: All deaths irrespective of cause and all prostate cancer-specific deaths were recorded. The data were analyzed using Cox regression analysis and the log-rank test. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, a significant overall survival advantage was observed in favor of CAB over LHRH-A monotherapy (Cox regression analysis: hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.99; P = .0498; log-rank test: P = .0425). The difference in cause-specific survival between the 2 groups was not significant. The achievement of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir concentration <= 1 ng/mL was a prognostic factor for improved survival. More patients attained PSA nadir concentrations <= 1 ng/mL with CAB compared with patients who received LHRH-A monotherapy (81.4% vs 33.7%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CAB with bicalutamide 80 mg offered a significant overall survival benefit compared with LHRH-A monotherapy without reducing tolerability in patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer 2009;115:3437-45. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available