4.7 Article

Identification of 12 or More Lymph Nodes in Resected Colon Cancer Specimens as an Indicator of Quality Performance

Journal

CANCER
Volume 115, Issue 9, Pages 1840-1848

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24185

Keywords

colon cancer; colorectal fellowship training; lymph nodes; pathology procedures

Categories

Funding

  1. Hoag Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Identification of >= 12 lymph nodes in resected colon cancer specimens has been endorsed as a quality indicator. METHODS: The Hoag Hospital cancer registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with colon cancer. The proportion of colon cancer specimens for which >= 12 lymph nodes were identified was determined by anatomic location, stage of disease, patient age, and operating surgeon. Survival was correlated with stage and with whether >= 12 lymph nodes were identified. RESULTS: Pathology procedural changes in 1998 were associated with an increase in the average number of lymph nodes identified from 8.0 to 14.5 (P < .0001); therefore, analysis was limited to 574 patients who underwent surgical resection of colon adenocarcinoma during 1998 to 2005. Identification of >= 12 lymph nodes varied from 57% to 83% by 7 anatomic locations (P < .0001), from 65% to 75% by 5 age cohorts (P = .027), from 59% to 73% by 4 general stages of disease (P = .004), and from 53% to 80% among 12 surgeons who performed at least 17 resections (P = .014). The proportion of resections in which >= 12 lymph nodes were identified was higher for 3 colorectal fellowship-trained surgeons compared with the other 9 surgeons (77% vs 63%, P = .0007), and with 30 surgeons who each performed <10 resections (77% vs 51%, P < .0001). Identification of >= 12 lymph nodes was associated with better survival for patients with stage I (P = .016) and stage II (P = .021) disease. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic location, colorectal surgical training, and case volume were strongly correlated with the number of lymph nodes identified. Cancer 2009;115:1840-8. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available