4.5 Review

Genetic modulation of adenosine receptor function and adenosine handling in murine hearts: Insights and issues

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 693-705

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.12.012

Keywords

adenosine; adenosine receptor; cardioprotection; coronary; gene knockout; infarction; inflammation; ischemia-reperfusion; myocardial; preconditioning; transgenic models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adenosine receptor system has been attributed with a broad range of both physiological and so-called 'retaliatory' functions in the heart and vessels. Despite many years of research, the precise roles of adenosine within the cardiovascular system continue to be debated, and new functions are continually emerging. Adenosine acts via 4 known G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) sub-types: A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors (ARs). In addition to roles in cardiovascular control, these receptors may represent therapeutic targets, having been attributed with roles in modifying cell death and injury, inflammatory processes, and cardiac and vascular remodeling during/after ischemic or hypoxic insult. A number of models have been developed in which AR sub-types and adenosine handling enzymes have been genetically deleted or transgenically overexpressed in an attempt to more equivocally identify the regulatory functions of these proteins, to identify their potential value as therapeutic targets, and to uncover new regulatory functions of this receptor family. Findings generally support current dogma regarding cardioprotection via A(1) and A(3)ARs, and coronary vasoregulation via A(2)AR sub-types. However, some outcomes are both novel and controversial. This review outlines AR-modified murine models currently under study from the perspective of cardiovascular phenotype. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available