4.7 Article

Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced skin rashes - Results of a placebo-controlled trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N03CB)

Journal

CANCER
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 847-853

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23621

Keywords

epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor; tetracycline; skin rash; severity; quality of life

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-35090, CA-37417, U10 CA037404, U10 CA035267, CA-35195, CA-35269, U10 CA035090, U10 CA035103, U10 CA037417, K24 CA131099, N01 CA035431, CA-63848, U10 CA035269, CA-25224, CA-37404, U10 CA035101, U10 CA063848, CA-35113, CA-35103, U10 CA035195, CA-35415, U10 CA035431, U10 CA063849, CA-35101, U10 CA025224, CA-35267, CA-63849, U10 CA035415, U10 CA035113] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are effective cancer therapies, but they are reported to cause a rash in > 50% of patients. In the current study, the authors examined the use of tetracycline for rash prevention. METHODS. This placebo - controlled, double-blinded trial enrolled patients who were starting cancer treatment with an EGR inhibitor. Patients could not have had a rash at the time of enrollment. All patients were randomly assigned to receive either tetracycline at a dose of 500 mg orally twice a day for 28 days versus a placebo. Patients were monitored for rash (through monthly physician assessment and weekly patient- reported questionnaires), quality of life (using the SKINDEX-16, a skin-specific quality of life index), and adverse events. Monitoring occurred during the 4-week intervention and then for an additional 4 weeks. The primary objective of the current study was to compare the incidence of rash between the study arms, and the enrollment of 30 patients per arm provided a 90% probability of detecting a 40% difference in incidence with a P value of .05 (2-sided). RESULTS. A total of 61 evaluable patients were enrolled. The 2 treatment arms were well balanced with regard to baseline characteristics, dropout rates, and rates of discontinuation of the EGFR inhibitor. The incidence of rash was found to be comparable across treatment arms. Physicians reported that 16 patients treated with tetracycline (70%) and 22 patients treated with placebo (76%) developed a rash (P =.61). Tetracycline appears to have lessened the rash severity, although the high dropout rates invite caution when interpreting these findings. By Week 4, physician-reported grade 2 rash (using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) occurred in 17% of tetracycline-treated patients (n = 4 patients) and in 55% of placebo-exposed patients (n = 16 patients) (P =.04). Patients treated with tetracycline reported better scores, as per the SKINDEX-16, on certain quality-of-life parameters such as skin burning or stinging, skin irritation, and being bothered by the persist-ence/recurrence of a skin condition. Adverse events were found to be comparable across treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS. In the current study, tetracycline was not found to prevent EGFR inhibitor-induced rashes and therefore cannot be clinically recommended for this purpose. However, preliminary observations of diminished rash severity and improved quality of life suggest this antibiotic merits further study. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available