4.7 Review

A review of the clinical relevance of mismatch-repair deficiency in ovarian cancer

Journal

CANCER
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 733-742

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23601

Keywords

mismatch repair; ovarian cancer; microsatellite instability; immunohistochemistry; hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; mutL homolog 1; mutS homolog 2; MMR genes

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K07 CA108987-01A2, R01 CA111914-02, R01 CA111914, K07 CA108987, R01CA111914] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in both cancer incidence and mortality among women in the United States. Defects in the mismatch-repair (MMR) pathway that arise through genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms may be important etiologically in a reasonable proportion of ovarian cancers. Genetic mechanisms of MMR dysfunction include germline and somatic mutations in the MMR proteins. Germline mutations cause hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) which is the third most common cause of inherited ovarian cancer after BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. An epigenetic mechanism known to cause inactivation of the MMR system is promoter hypermethylation of 1 of the MMR genes, mutL homolog 1 (MLH1). Various laboratory methods, in addition to clinical and histopathologic criteria, call be used to identify MMR-deficient ovarian cancers. Such methods include microsatellite instability analysis, immunohistochemistry, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation testing, and germline mutation analysis'. In this review, the authors describe the existing literature regarding the molecular, clinical, and histologic characteristics of MMR-deficient ovarian cancers along with the possible effect on survival and treatment response. By further defining the profile of MMR-deficient ovarian cancers and their associated etiologic mechanisms, there may be a greater potential to distinguish between those of hereditary and sporadic etiology. The ability to make such distinctions may be, of diagnostic. prognostic, and therapeutic utility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available