4.3 Article

Elucidating the relationship between negative affectivity and symptoms: The role of illness-specific affective responses

Journal

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 77-86

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/BF02879923

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [R01 HS09973] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG023958] Funding Source: Medline
  3. AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY [R01HS009973] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R24AG023958] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. More than 20 years of research confirm a positive association of trait negative affect (NA) with reports of physical symptoms. As the mechanisms underlying the association of trait NA and symptom reporting have not been identified, the meaning of the association remains unclear. Purpose: We attempted to clarify the processes underlying this association by examining the relationship of trait NA and illness-specific worry to both vague, general symptoms and illness-specific symptoms. We tested the hypothesis that trait NA has both a biasing effect when ambiguous symptoms are interpreted as a sign of physical illness and an accuracy effect on the reports of illnesss-pecific symptoms mediated by illness-specific worry. Method: We examined the relationship of trait and state NA to symptoms reports in both cross-sectional and longitudinal data from inner-city adults with moderate and severe asthma. Results: Whereas high levels of trait NA were associated with reports of both asthma and nonasthma symptoms, only the relationship of trait NA to symptoms specific to asthma was mediated by asthma worry. In addition, these data showed that trait NA was not associated with the misattribution of symptoms to disease. Conclusions: We concluded that NA motivates individuals, through asthma worry, to be more aware of illness-specific symptoms and correctly report and attribute these symptoms to asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available