4.0 Article

Regional Sustainability of the Chateauguay River Aquifers

Journal

CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 487-501

Publisher

CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOC-CWRA
DOI: 10.4296/cwrj3504487

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministere du Developpement durable
  2. de l'Environnement et des Parcs du Quebec
  3. Geological Survey of Canada
  4. l'Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement (INRS-ETE)
  5. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A steady increase in groundwater use in the Chateauguay River watershed has led to potential conflicts between various groundwater users. This study summarizes the quantity and sustainability estimations of the groundwater resources within this basin. Regional sustainability is defined with simulated drawdowns from uniform withdrawal scenarios compared to water levels obtained without any withdrawal. Three sustainable conditions are defined: sustainable withdrawal, withdrawal with increased drawdown, and unsustainable withdrawal. The current withdrawal rate of 34 Mm(3)/yr results in a median drawdown of 1.5 m, compared to pre-development conditions. This drawdown is well within the range considered sustainable, an indication that regional aquifers are not currently overexploited. A hypothetical pumping rate of 48 Mm(3)/yr, resulting in an average drawdown of 2.2 m, is the estimated sustainable limit. Increasing exploitation from 48 to 122 Mm(3)/yr would need tight control and planning. Withdrawal rates beyond 122 Mm(3)/yr are judged not sustainable as the regional median drawdown would exceed 8 m. The water levels in recharge areas are the most sensitive to groundwater extraction. The combination of aquifer sensitivity to recharge variations, simulated drawdown maps, and aquifer vulnerability to surface contamination reveals the most sensitive areas of the regional aquifers, areas that would need particular attention and protection by groundwater managers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available