4.2 Article

Dispersal and dive patterns in gravid leatherback turtles during the nesting season in French Guiana

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 338, Issue -, Pages 233-247

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps338233

Keywords

marine turtles; Dermochelys coriacea; diving behaviour; bottom phase; continental shelf; foraging strategy; satellite tracking; French Guiana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first combined analysis of diving behaviour and dispersal data collected from gravid leatherback turtles during 3 consecutive nesting seasons in French Guiana. In total, 23 turtles were fitted with Argos satellite transmitters and 16 individuals (including 6 that were concurrently satellite-tracked) were equipped with an electronic time-depth recorder for single inter-nesting intervals, i.e. between 2 consecutive ovi-positions. The leatherbacks dispersed over the continental shelf -from the coastal zone to the shelf break-and moved over 546.2 +/- 154.1 km (mean SD) in waters of French Guiana and neighbouring Suriname. They mostly performed shallow (9.4 +/- 9.2 m) and short (4.4 +/- 3.4 min) dives with a slight diurnal pattern. They dived deeper as they moved away from the coast, suggesting that they were predominantly following the seabed. Inter-nesting intervals could be divided into 2 phases: the first comprised 75 % of the time turtles spent at sea, during which they dived on average 47 min h(-1), while the second was characterised by lower and more variable diving effort as the turtles returned to shore. The extended movements of leatherbacks and the fine analysis of dive shapes suggest that, in French Guiana, leatherbacks may feed during the inter-nesting interval, probably to compensate for the energy costs associated with reproduction. Consequently, this critically endangered species is exposed to a high risk of interaction with local fisheries over the continental shelf.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available