4.2 Article

Roles of DRB1*1501 and DRB1*1502 in the pathogenesis of aplastic anemia

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 13-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.09.002

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Although a number of reports have documented a significantly increased incidence of HLA-DR15 in aplastic anemia (AA), the exact role of HLA-DR15 in the immune mechanisms of AA remains unclear. We herein clarify the difference between DRB1*1501 and DRB1*1502, the two DRB1 alleles that determine the presentation of HLA-DR15, in the pathophysiology of AA. Materials and Methods. We investigated the relationships of the patients* HLA-DRB1 allele with both the presence of a small population of CD55(-)CD59(-) (PNH-type) blood cells and the response to antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporin (CsA) therapy in 140 Japanese AA patients. Results. Of the 30 different DRB1 alleles, only DRB1*1501 (33.6% vs 12.8%, p(c) < 0.01) and DRB1*1502 (43.6% vs 24.4%, p(c) < 0.01) displayed significantly higher frequencies among the AA patients than among a control. AA patients possessing HLA-DR15 tended to be old, and especially, the frequency of DRB1*1502 in patients 40 years of age and older (52.4%) was markedly higher than that in those younger than 40 years old (16.2%, p(c) < 0.01). Only DRB1*1501 was significantly associated with the presence of a small population of PNH-type cells and it also showed a good response to ATG plus CsA therapy in a univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis showed only the presence of a small population of PNH-type cells to be a significant factor associated with a good response to the immunosuppressive therapy (P < 0.01). Conclusions. Although both DRB1*1501 and DRB1*1502 contribute to the development of AA, the methods of contribution differ between the two alleles. (c) 2007 International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available