Journal
ENERGY POLICY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 265-279Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.019
Keywords
compound real options; renewable energy technology R&D; research benefits analysis
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Benefits analysis of US Federal government research, development, demonstration, and deployment (RD3) programmes for renewable energy (RE) technology improvement typically employs a deterministic forecast of the cost and performance of renewable and nonrenewable fuels. The benefits estimate for the programme derives from the difference between two forecasts, with and without the RD3 programme in place. Three deficiencies of this approach are that it ignores: (1) uncertainty in the cost of non-renewable energy (NRE);(2) the possibility of adjustment to the RD3 effort commensurate with the evolving state of the world; and (3) the underlying technical risk associated with RD. In this paper, an intuitive approach to determining the option value of RE RD is developed. This approach seeks to tackle the first two deficiencies noted above by providing an estimate via a compound real option of an RE RD3 programme in a future with uncertain NRE costs. A binomial lattice reveals the economic intuition underlying the decision-making process, while a numerical example illustrates the option components embedded in a simplified representation of current US Federal RE RD3. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available