4.2 Article

Identification of nursery habitats for commercially valuable humphead wrasse Cheilinus undulatus and large groupers (Pisces : Serranidae) in Palau

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 332, Issue -, Pages 189-199

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps332189

Keywords

fish habitat; nursery areas; grouper; humphead wrasse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years there has been increasing interest in conserving fish habitats. However, fish-habitat associations, particularly nursery habitat for early juvenile stages, are poorly known for most reef fishes. Using mark-recapture techniques, I examined among-habitat variation in settlement, post-settlement growth, and persistence, and movement in 3 large, vulnerable, and commercially important reef fishes: the humphead wrasse Cheffinus undulatus, the squaretail coralgrouper Plectropomus areolatus, and the camouflage grouper Epinepheluspolyphekadion. Both the humphead wrasse and the coralgrouper appeared to utilize specific nursery habitats. Settlement, growth, and persistence of humphead wrasse were highest in branching coral structures mixed with bushy macroalgae (BCMA). Of all tagged C. undulatus recaptured in intermediate or adult habitats, 80% were tagged post-settlement in BCMA. Early juvenile P. areolatus were found almost exclusively in coral rubble habitats on the slopes of tidal channels, at a narrow depth range of 5 to 7 m. This dependence on one habitat type could render this species vulnerable to shipping or dredging operations or other forms of coastal development. E. polyphekadion appeared to be a habitat generalist, and no specific nursery habitat could be identified. In summary, spatial management (e.g. implementation of marine protected areas) should prioritize habitats for conservation according to their value as essential nursery or spawning habitats for target species needing protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available