4.5 Article

Methotrexate loaded chitosan nanoparticles: Preparation, radiolabeling and in vitro evaluation for breast cancer diagnosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 107-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.10.004

Keywords

Methotrexate; Chitosan nanoparticles; Technetium-99m; Radiolabeling; Radiopharmaceuticals; Breast cancer diagnosis

Funding

  1. Ege University, Scientific Research Projects Commission [14-ECZ-037]
  2. Aliye Uster Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to developed radiolabeled methotrexate (MIX) loaded nanoparticulate systems for breast cancer imaging. For this aim, two formulations (F1 and F2) of MIX loaded chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) were prepared via ionic gelation process by using CS and tripolyphosphate (TPP). The obtained results showed that by using F1 and F2 formulations with mean diameter of 169.000 nm and 427.633 nm, zeta potential of 20.133 mV and 29.067 mV were successfully developed with ionotropic gelation process and the encapsulation efficiency (EE) of F1 and F2 was found nearly 35% and 64% respectively. In addition, MTX-CSNPs were radiolabeled by Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) and radiochemical purity and stability of labeled compound were performed using a gamma counter up to 6 h. Results indicated that MTX-CSNPs were radiolabeled by Tc-99m with high labeling efficiency (>90%) and stability. For in vitro incorporation studies the uptake differences between Tc-99m labeled MIX loaded and unloaded CSNPs, reduced/hydrolyzed (R/H) Tc-99m were evaluated in human breast cancer (MCF-7) and human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell lines. According to cell culture studies, the incorporation percentages of Tc-99m-MTX-CSNPs were highly uptake in cancer cell line. The results demonstrated that radiolabeled MTX-CSNPs may be a promising agent for breast cancer diagnosis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available