4.5 Article

Signaling mechanisms involved in disuse muscle atrophy

Journal

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 310-321

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.11.043

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prolonged periods of skeletal muscle inactivity due to bed rest, denervation, hindlimb unloading, immobilization, or microgravity, can result in significant muscle atrophy. The muscle atrophy is characterized as decreased muscle fiber cross-sectional area and protein content, reduced force, increased insulin resistance as well as a slow to fast fiber type transition. The decreases in protein synthesis and increases in protein degradation rates account for the majority of the rapid Loss of muscle protein due to disuse. However, we are just beginning to pay more attention on the identification of genes involved in triggering initial responses to physical inactivity/ microgravity. Our review mainly focuses on the signaling pathways involved in protein loss during disuse atrophy, including two recently identified ubiquitin ligases: muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1) and muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx). Recent reports suggest that inhibition of the IGF-1 /Pl3K/Akt pathway in muscle may be involved in the progression of disuse atrophy. NF-kappa B seems to be a key intracellular signal transducer in disuse atrophy. Factors such as myostatin, p38 and calcineurin can induce muscle protein loss under specified conditions, but further experiments are needed to determine whether they are necessary components of disuse atrophy. Where possible, the molecular mechanisms underlying the slow to fast fiber type transition and increased insulin resistance in atrophic muscles are discussed as well. Collectively, the disuse-induced muscle atrophy is a highly ordered process that is controlled by interactions between intracellular signaling pathways rather than isolated pathways. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available