4.6 Article

Hidden Seyfert 2 galaxies in the Chandra Deep Field North

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages 1263-1275

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/520801

Keywords

galaxies : Seyfert; X-rays : diffuse background; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have compared the X-ray-to-optical flux ratios (F-X/ F-opt) of absorbed active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the Chandra Deep Field North (CDF- N) with those of nearby, optically classified Seyfert 2 galaxies. The comparison provides an opportunity to explore the extent to which the local population of absorbed AGNs can account for the properties of the distant, spectroscopically ambiguous sources that produce the hard X-ray background. Our nearby sample consists of 38 objects that well represent the local Seyfert 2 luminosity function. Integrated UBVRI photometry and broadband X-ray observations are presented. Using these data, we have simulated the FX/ Fopt ratios that local Seyfert 2s would exhibit if they were observed in the redshift range 0.2 <= z <= 1.3 as part of the CDF-N. In the simulations we account for the effects of redshift on flux measurements in fixed observed-frame bands and the way the luminosity function of a given population is sampled in a flux- limited survey like the CDF-N. Overall, we find excellent agreement between our simulations and the observed distribution of F-X/F-opt ratios for absorbed AGNs in the CDF-N. Our analysis has thus failed to reveal any physical differences between the local population of Seyfert 2s and CDF-N sources with similar X-ray properties. These results support the hypothesis that the nuclear emission lines of many distant hard X-ray galaxies are hidden in ground-based spectra due to a combination of observational effects: signal-to-noise ratio, wavelength coverage, and dilution by host-galaxy light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available