4.5 Review

Molecular basis of the effects of mechanical stretch on vascular smooth muscle cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 947-960

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.011

Keywords

mechanical stretch; mechanotransduction; signaling; strain; vascular smooth muscle cells

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL019454, F32HL071390, P01HL043026, R01HL064382] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pulsatile nature of blood pressure and flow creates hemodynamic stimuli in the forms of cyclic stretch and shear stress, which exert continuous influences on the constituents of the blood vessel wall. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) use multiple sensing mechanisms to detect the mechanical stimulus resulting from pulsatile stretch and transduce it into intracellular signals that lead to modulations of gene expression and cellular functions, e.g., proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and remodeling. The cytoskeleton provides a structural framework for the VSMC to transmit mechanical forces between its luminal, abluminal, and junctional surfaces, as well as its interior, including the focal adhesion sites, the cytoplasm, and the nucleus. VSMCs also respond differently to the surrounding structural environment, e.g., two-dimensional versus three-dimensional matrix. In vitro studies have been conducted on cultured VSMCs on deformable substrates to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which the cells convert mechanical inputs into biochemical events, eventually leading to functional responses. The knowledge gained from research on mechanotransduction in vitro, in conjunction with verifications under in vivo conditions, will advance our understanding of the physiological and pathological processes involved in vascular remodeling and adaptation in health and disease. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available