4.6 Article

Optical spectroscopy and X-ray detections of a sample of quasars and active galactic nuclei selected in the mid-infrared from two Spitzer space telescope wide-area surveys

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages 186-205

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/509617

Keywords

galaxies : Seyfert; infrared : galaxies; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present optical spectroscopy of a sample of 77 luminous active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and quasars selected on the basis of their mid-infrared colors. Our objects are selected from the Spitzer Extragalactic First Look Survey and the SWIRE XMM-Newton Large-Scale Structure Survey (XMM-LSS) fields, with a typical 24 mu m flux density of 5 mJy. The median redshift is 0.6, with a range of similar to 0.05-4. Only 33%(25 out of 77) of these objects are normal type 1 quasars, with no obscuration. Forty-four percent (34 out of 77) are type 2 objects, with high-ionization, narrow emission lines, and 14% (11 out of 77) are dust-reddened type 1 quasars, showing broad lines but a dust-reddened or unusually weak quasar continuum. Nine percent (7 out of 77) show no sign of an AGN in the optical spectrum, having either starburst spectra or spectra that could be of either starburst or LINER type. These latter objects are analogous to the X-ray-detected population of AGNs with weak or nonexistent optical AGN emission (the X-ray-bright, optically normal galaxies). Of our objects from the SWIRE field, 21 fall within moderately deep XMM-Newton exposures. All the unobscured quasars and about half the obscured quasars are detected in these exposures. This sample, when taken together with other samples of Spitzer-selected AGNs and quasars and results from X-ray studies, confirms that obscured-AGNs dominate the AGN and quasar number counts of all rapidly accreting supermassive black hole systems, at least for z less than or similar to 4. This implies a high radiative efficiency for the black hole accretion process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available