4.5 Article

K-ras mutation detection in colorectal cancer using the Pyrosequencing technique

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 203, Issue 7, Pages 489-497

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2007.06.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of gene mutations is a critical goal for the assessment of diagnosis and prognosis in cancer disease, particularly by direct sequencing. Pyrosequencing is a straightforward, non-electrophoretic DNA sequencing method using the luciferase-luciferin light release as a signal for nucleotide incorporation into a PCR template DNA. In this study, we aimed to investigate mutations in the K-ras gene using Pyrosequencing technology, because its reliable chemistry and robust detection mechanism allow for rapid, real-time detection of sequencing events. For the simultaneous detection of the predominant K-ras codons 12 and 13 mutations, we established a sequencing protocol based on the design of a single PCR primer pair and a single sequencing primer. The assay has been validated with DNA from 65 colorectal carcinomas. Furthermore, analysis of the rare K-ras codon 61 mutation was included. In 29% (19/65) of the patients, the K-ras gene was found to be mutated, whereas codons 12 and 13 were most frequently affected (18/65, 27.7%). Mutations with the highest frequency were G -> A transitions (12/19, 63%), followed by G -> T transversions (5/19, 26%). Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with a tumor containing K-ras codon 12 mutations than in those without K-ras codon 12 mutations (p = 0.024). In conclusion, we found Pyrosequencing to be a suitable technology for fast detection of hot-spot mutations in the K-ras oncogene. We demonstrated an important relationship between K-ras codon 12 mutations and overall survival in colorectal cancer patients. (c) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available