4.6 Article

AATSR land surface temperature product algorithm verification over a WATERMED site

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 171-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.024

Keywords

land surface temperature; AATSR; top of atmosphere brightness temperatures; radiative transfer modelling; thermal infrared

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new operational Land Surface Temperature (LST) product generated from data acquired by the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) provides the opportunity to measure LST on a global scale with a spatial resolution of 1 km(2). The target accuracy of the product, which utilises nadir data from the AATSR thermal channels at 11 and 12 mu m, is 2.5 K for daytime retrievals and 1.0 K at night. We present the results of an experiment where the performance of the algorithm has been assessed for one daytime and one night time overpass occurring over the WATERMED field site near Marrakech, Morocco, on 05 March 2003. Top of atmosphere (TOA) brightness temperatures (BTs) are simulated for 12 pixels from each overpass using a radiative transfer model, with the LST product and independent emissivity values and atmospheric data as inputs. We have estimated the error in the LST product over this biome for this set of conditions by applying the operational AATSR LST retrieval algorithm to the modelled BTs and comparing the results with the original AATSR LSTs input into the model. An average bias of - 1.00 K (standard deviation 0.07 K) for the daytime data, and - 1.74 K (standard deviation 0.02 K) for the night time data is obtained, which indicates that the algorithm is yielding an LST that is too cold under these conditions. While these results are within specification for daytime retrievals, this suggests that the target accuracy of 1.0 K at night is not being met within this biome. (C) 2006 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available