3.8 Article

Unique deletion in Exon 5 of SHOX gene in a patient with idiopathic short stature

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 61-66

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000096087

Keywords

SHOX gene; Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis; idiopathic short stature; Madelung deformity; pseudoautosomal region

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim: It is known that haploinsufficiency for the SHOX gene (short-stature homeobox gene on the X chromosome) is responsible for short stature in Turner syndrome and Leri-Weill dyschondrogenesis, and it has been reported that it is responsible for upwards of 1 in 50 cases of idiopathic short stature. SHOX haploinsufficiency is also associated with various radiographic abnormalities, such as coarse trabecular pattern, short metacarpals/metatarsals with metaphyseal flaring, altered osseous alignment at the wrist, radial/tibial bowing, triangularization of the radial head, abnormal tuberosity of the humerus, and an abnormal femoral neck. Shortening and bowing of the radius and dorsal dislocation of the distal ulna characterize the Madelung deformity. These characteristic findings led us to do a study assessing the predictive value of certain radiographic features in association with genetic markers of idiopathic short stature. Methods: Here we describe a case of a Hispanic male with idiopathic short stature and Madelung deformity with a novel mutation in the SHOX gene. Results: Additional studies revealed a strong family history of short stature and the same SHOX mutation segregating from the mother. Conclusion: This case resulted in the description of a novel mutation in exon 5 (M202delA) and suggests the importance of screening for SHOX mutations in patients with idiopathic short stature with subtle radiographic abnormalities, including the components of the Madelung deformity in their bone age films. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available