4.6 Article

Efficacy and safety of adeno-associated viral vectors based on serotype 8 and 9 vs. lentiviral vectors for hemophilia B gene therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 16-24

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02220.x

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; coagulation; factor IX; gene therapy; hemophilia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Adeno-associated viral (AAV) and lentiviral vectors are promising vectors for gene therapy for hemophilia because they are devoid of viral genes and have the potential for long-term gene expression. Objectives: To compare the performance of different AAV serotypes (AAV8 and AAV9) vs. lentiviral vectors expressing factor (F) IX. Methods and results: AAV-based and lentiviral vectors were generated that express FIX from the same hepatocyte-specific expression cassette. AAV9 transduced the liver as efficiently as AAV8 and resulted in supra-physiological FIX levels (3000-6000% of normal) stably correcting the bleeding diathesis. Surprisingly, AAV9 resulted in unprecedented and widespread cardiac gene transfer, which was more efficient than with AAV8. AAV8 and AAV9 were not associated with any proinflammatory cytokine induction, in accordance with their minimal interactions with innate immune effectors. In contrast, lentiviral transduction resulted in modest and stable FIX levels near the therapeutic threshold (1%) and triggered a rapid self-limiting proinflammatory response (interleukin-6), which probably reflected their ability to efficiently interact with the innate immune system. Conclusions: AAV8 and 9 result in significantly higher FIX expression levels and have a reduced proinflammatory risk in comparison with lentiviral vectors. The unexpected cardiotropic properties of AAV9 have implications for gene therapy for heart disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available