4.6 Article

Spectropolarimetry of the classical T Tauri star TW Hydrae

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages 73-80

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/509134

Keywords

stars : individual (TW Hya); stars : magnetic fields; stars : pre-main sequence; techniques : polarimetric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present high-resolution (R approximate to 60,000) circular spectropolarimetry of the classical T Tauri star TW Hydrae. We analyze 12 photospheric absorption lines and measure the net longitudinal magnetic field for six consecutive nights. While no net polarization is detected the first five nights, a significant photospheric field of B-z = 149 +/- 33 G is found on the sixth night. To rule out spurious instrumental polarization, we apply the same analysis technique to several nonmagnetic telluric lines, detecting no significant polarization. We further demonstrate the reality of this field detection by showing that the splitting between right and left polarized components in these 12 photospheric lines shows a linear trend with Lande g-factor times wavelength squared, as predicted by the Zeeman effect. However, this longitudinal field detection is still much lower than that which would result if a pure dipole magnetic geometry is responsible for the mean magnetic field strength of 2.6 kG previously reported for TW Hya. We also detect strong circular polarization in the He I lambda 5876 and Ca II lambda 8498 emission lines, indicating a strong field in the line formation region of these features. The polarization of the Ca II line is substantially weaker than that of the He I line, which we interpret as being due to a larger contribution to the Ca II line from chromospheric emission in which the polarization signals cancel. However, the presence of polarization in the Ca II line indicates that accretion shocks on classical T Tauri stars do produce narrow emission features in the infrared triplet lines of calcium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available