4.4 Article

Investigation of the complex I assembly chaperones B17-2L and NDUFAF1 in a cohort of CI deficient patients

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages 176-182

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.02.007

Keywords

complex 1; NADH : ubiquinone oxidoreductase; assembly; chaperones; NDUFAF1; B17.2L; mimitin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysfunction of complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase; CI), the largest enzyme of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system, often results in severe neuromuscular disorders and early childhood death. Mutations in its seven mitochondrial and 38 nuclear DNA-encoded structural components can only partly explain these deficiencies. Recently, CI assembly chaperones NDUFAF1 and B17.2L were linked to CI deficiency, but it is still unclear by which mechanism. To better understand their requirement during assembly we have studied their presence in CI subcomplexes in a cohort of CI deficient patients using one- and two-dimensional blue-native PAGE. This analysis revealed distinct differences between their associations to subcomplexes in different patients. B17.2L occurred in a 830 kDa subcomplex specifically in patients with mutations in subunits NDUFV1 and NDUFS4. Contrasting with this seemingly specific requirement, the previously described NDUFAF1 association to 500-85OkDa intermediates did not appear to be related to the nature and severity of the CI assembly defect. Surprisingly, even in the absence of assembly intermediates in a patient harboring a mutation in translation elongation factor G1 (EFGI), NDUFAF1 remained associated to the 500-850 kDa subcomplexes. These findings illustrate the difference in mechanism between B17.2L and NDUFAF1 and suggest that the involvement of NDUFAF1 in the assembly process could be indirect rather than direct via the binding to assembly intermediates. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available