4.4 Review

Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 191, Issue 3, Pages 483-495

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0626-6

Keywords

dopamine; accumbens; VTA; prefrontal cortex; decision; neuroeconomics

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [5 P01 DA015916-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [P01DA015916] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale Throughout our lives we constantly assess the costs and benefits of the possible future outcomes of our actions and use this information to guide behavior. There is accumulating evidence that dopamine contributes to a fundamental component of this computation-how rewards are compared with the costs incurred when obtaining them. Objective We review the evidence for dopamine's role in cost-benefit decision making and outline a simple mathematical framework in which to represent the interactions between rewards, costs, behavioral state and dopamine. Conclusions Dopamine's effects on cost-benefit decision making can be modeled using simple utility-function curves. This approach provides a useful framework for modeling existing data and generating experimental hypotheses that can be objectively and quantitatively tested by observing choice behavior without the necessity to account for subjective psychological states such as pleasure or desire. We suggest that dopamine plays a key role in overcoming response costs and enabling high-effort behaviors. A particularly important anatomical site of this action is the core of the nucleus accumbens. Here, dopamine is able to modulate activity originating from the frontal cortical systems that also assess costs and rewards. Internal deprivation states (e.g., hunger and thirst) also help to energize goal-seeking behaviors, probably in part by their rich influence on dopamine, which can in turn modify decision making policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available