4.5 Article

Observational study to compare the clinical efficacy of the natural surfactants Alveofact and Curosurf in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 169-176

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.033

Keywords

surfactant; respiratory distress syndrome; gas exchange; outcome; premature infant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Natural surfactants have been shown to be superior to synthetic surfactants in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). In Germany, Alveofact((R)) (A) and Curosurf((R)) (C) are the most frequently used natural surfactant preparations. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to compare the effects of A and C on gas exchange and outcome in premature infants. Methods: During a 5-year period in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 187 premature infants were treated with surfactant, with 82 receiving A and 105 receiving C. We recorded F1O2 and gas exchange (PaO2/F1O2 ratio, PaCO2, SaO(2)) during the first 72 h after surfactant application and the incidence of outcome parameters at day 28 (bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricutar hemorrhage (IVH grade III or IV), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), pneumothorax, necrotizing enterocolites (NEC) and death). The differences between the patient groups were assessed by ANOVA or the calculation of relative risks. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between infants treated with A and C in mean gestational age (28.4 vs. 28.4 weeks), birth weight (1210 vs. 1258g) and time of first surfactant application (60 vs. 90min postnatal).gases, or in incidence at day 28 of BPD (41.7% vs. 42.8%), IVH III/IV (18.3% vs. 14.3%), pneumothorax (9.8% vs. 4.8%), PDA (23.2% vs. 21.9%), PVL (7.3% vs. 9.5%) and death (17% vs. 17.1%). There were also no statistically significant differences in the subgroup of infants < 28 weeks. The lower incidence of NEC in A compared with C (1.2% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.01) was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Conclusion: Independent of gestational age no significant difference in the clinical efficacy of A and C was observed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available