4.6 Article

Fertilization effects on fineroot biomass, rhizosphere microbes and respiratory fluxes in hardwood forest soils

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 176, Issue 3, Pages 655-664

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02204.x

Keywords

forest fertilization; northern red oak (Quercus rubra); nutrient availability; rhizodeposition; root exudates; soil respiration; sugar maple (Acer saccharum); yellow birch (Betula allegheniensis)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fertilizer-induced reductions in CO2 flux from soil (F-co2) in forests have previously been attributed to decreased carbon allocation to roots, and decreased decomposition as a result of nitrogen suppression of fungal activity. Here, we present evidence that decreased microbial respiration in the rhizosphere may also contribute to F-co2 reductions in fertilized forest soils. Fertilization reduced F-co2 by 16-19% in 65-yr-old plantations of northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum), and in a natural 85-yr-old yellow birch (Betula allegheniensis) stand. In oak plots, fertilization had no effects on fine root biomass but reduced mycorrhizal colonization by 18% and microbial respiration by 43%. In maple plots, fertilization reduced root biomass, mycorrhizal colonization and microbial respiration by 22, 16 and 46%, respectively. In birch plots, fertilization reduced microbial respiration by 36%, but had variable effects on root biomass and mycorrhizal colonization. In plots of all three species, fertilization effects on microbial respiration were greater in rhizosphere than in bulk soil, possibly as a result of decreased rhizosphere carbon flux from these species in fertile soils. Because rhizosphere processes may influence nutrient availability and carbon storage in forest ecosystems, future research is needed to better quantify rhizo-microbial contributions to F-co2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available