4.6 Article

Novel mannose-sequestration technique reveals variation in subcellular orthophosphate pools do not explain the effects of phosphorus nutrition on photosynthesis in Eucalyptus globulus seedlings

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 176, Issue 4, Pages 849-861

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02229.x

Keywords

electron transport rate (ETR); maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation (V-cmax); maximum rate of RuBP regeneration (J(max)); photosynthetic phosphorus-use efficiency (PPUE); subcellular orthophosphate

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

center dot Although only a small proportion of plant phosphorus (P) is used for photosynthesis, the relationships between P and photosynthesis can be strong. It was hypothesized, in this study, that variation in the allocation of orthophosphate (P-i) between active (cytoplasmic) and nonactive (vacuolar) pools would underpin differences in rates of photosynthesis in 4-month-old Eucalyptus globulus seedlings grown with a varying P supply. center dot Photosynthetic biochemistry was assessed by the response of net photosynthesis to increasing intercellular [CO2]. Cytoplasmic P-i was sequestered as mannose 6-phosphate. center dot Total P and the proportion of P as P-i were positively related to P supply. The ratios of active : stored P-i (10-24%) varied little over the range of treatments. Active P-i was positively related to P supply, as was photosynthesis (7 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1) with 0 mM P vs. 16 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1) with 0.32 mM P). Positive relationships between P supply and photosynthesis were explained best by leaf P content, not by active pools of P-i. center dot The distribution of P-i between the vacuole and the cytoplasm had little impact on the photosynthetic phosphorus-use efficiency (PPUE), and reductions in cytoplasmic P-i had little effect on photosynthesis. Hence, PPUE is an unsuitable guide for assessing plant responses to increasingly unavailable P in the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available