4.7 Article

Short-range spatial variability of soil delta N-15 natural abundance - effects on symbiotic N-2-fixation estimates in pea

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 298, Issue 1-2, Pages 265-272

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9367-5

Keywords

short-range; natural abundance; N(2)fixation; delta N-15 variability; Pisum sativum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The delta N-15 natural abundance (%) of the total soil N pool varies at the landscape level, but knowledge on short-range variability and consequences for the reliability of isotopic methods are poorly understood. The short-range spatial variability of soil delta N-15 natural abundance as revealed by the N-15 abundance in spring barley and N-2-fixing pea was measured within the 0.15-4 m scale at flowering and at maturity. The short-range spatial variability of soil delta N-15 natural abundance and symbiotic nitrogen fixation were high at both growth stages. Along a 4-m row, the delta N-15 natural abundance in barley reference plants varied up to 3.9 degrees C, and sometimes this variability was observed even between plants grown only 30 cm apart. The delta N-15 natural abundance in pea varied up to 1.4 parts per thousand within the 4-m row. The estimated percentage of nitrogen derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa) varied from 73-89% at flowering and from 57-95% at maturity. When increasing the sampling area from 0.01 m(2) (single plants) and up to 0.6 m(2) (14 plants) the %Ndfa coefficient of variation (CV) declined from 5 to 2% at flowering and from 12 to 2% at maturity. The implications of the short-range variability in delta N-15 natural-abundance are that estimates of symbiotic N-2-fixation can be obtained from the natural abundance method if at least half a square meter of crop and reference plants is sampled for the isotopic analysis. In fields with small amounts of representative reference crops (weeds) it might be necessary to sow in reference crop species to secure satisfying N-2-fixation estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available