4.4 Article

Immunohistological analysis of immune cells in blistering skin lesions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 62-71

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.037010

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bullous skin lesions are characterised by the presence of intraepidermal or subepidermal bullae. Although inflammatory cell infiltrate is a constant feature in these lesions, their immunophenotypic characterisation is still incomplete. Aim: To determine whether the development of bullous skin diseases is associated with changes in the inflammatory cell infiltrate. Materials and methods: 34 cases representing lesions with both intraepidermal and subepidermal bullae were examined using immunoperoxidase staining methods and antibodies targeting antigens for histiocytes (CD68), B cells (CD20+), T cells (CD3+), T cells with cytotoxic potential ( T cell intracellular associated antigen,TIA1+) and activity ( granzyme B, GRB+). The adjacent normal skin ( lesions) and an additional five cases of normal skin were also examined ( controls). Results: The transition from normal skin to lesional skin ( lesions with intraepidermal and subepidermal bullae) was associated with a significant increase (p <= 0.05) in the density of total inflammatory cell infiltrate, CD68+ cells, CD3+ T lymphocytes, CD20+ B lymphocytes, TIA1+-resting cytotoxic T cells and GRB+ T cells with cytotoxic activity. Conclusions: The increase in inflammatory cell infiltrate during the transition from normal to lesional skin may reflect the presence of an increased antigenicity of the lesional cells or a response to some basement membrane components. CD68+ and CD3+ cells, especially the resting cytotoxic ones, achieved numerical dominance in these lesions. Cell-mediated immunity seems to have critical role in the development of these lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available