4.7 Article

Cystatin C and beta2-microglobulin: markers of glomerular filtration in critically ill children

Journal

CRITICAL CARE
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/cc5923

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Parameters allowing regular evaluation of renal function in a paediatric intensive care unit ( PICU) are not optimal. The aim of the present study was to analyse the utility of serum cystatin C and beta2-microglobulin ( B2M) in detecting decreased glomerular filtration rate in critically ill children. Methods This was a prospective, observational study set in an eight-bed PICU. Twenty-five children were included. The inverses of serum creatinine, cystatin C, and B2M were correlated with creatinine clearance ( CrC) using a 24-hour urine sample and CrC estimation by Schwartz formula ( Schwartz). The diagnostic value of serum creatinine, cystatin C, and B2M to identify a glomerular filtration rate under 80 ml/minute per 1.73 m(2) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic ( ROC) curve analysis. Results Mean age was 2.9 years ( range, 0.1 to 13.9 years). CrC was less than 80 ml/minute per 1.73 m(2) in 14 children, and Schwartz was less than 80 ml/minute per 1.73 m(2) in 9 children. Correlations between inverse of B2M and CrC ( r = 0.477) and between inverse of B2M and Schwartz ( r = 0.697) were better than correlations between inverse of cystatin C and CrC ( r = 0.390) or Schwartz ( r = 0.586) and better than correlations between inverse of creatinine and CrC ( r = 0.104) or Schwartz ( r = 0.442). The ability of serum cystatin C and B2M to identify a CrC rate and a Schwartz CrC rate under 80 ml/minute per 1.73 m2 was better than that of creatinine ( areas under the ROC curve: 0.851 and 0.792 for cystatin C, 0.802 and 0.799 for B2M, and 0.633 and 0.625 for creatinine). Conclusion Serum cystatin C and B2M were confirmed as easy and useful markers, better than serum creatinine, to detect acute kidney injury in critically ill children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available