4.4 Article

Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 29, Issue 14, Pages 1117-1127

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03323310600950411

Keywords

behavioural intervention; confidence; disability; recovery; stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist Office [HSRU2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. Disability following stroke is highly prevalent and is predicted by psychological variables such as control cognitions and emotions, in addition to clinical variables. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a workbook- based intervention, designed to change cognitions about control, in improving outcomes for patients and their carers. Method. At discharge, stroke patients were randomly allocated ( with their carers) to a 5-week intervention ( n = 103) or control ( normal care: n = 100). The main outcome ( at 6 months) was recovery from disability using a performance measure, with distress and satisfaction as additional outcomes. Results. The intervention group showed significantly better disability recovery, allowing for initial levels of disability, than those in the control group, F( 1,201) = 5.61, p = 0.019. Groups did not differ in distress or satisfaction with care for patients or carers. The only psychological process variable improved by the intervention was Confidence in Recovery but this did not mediate the effects on recovery. Conclusions. A large proportion of intervention participants did not complete the workbook tasks. This was perhaps associated with the fairly low level of personal contact with workbook providers. The modest success of this intervention suggests that it may be possible to develop effective behavioural interventions to enhance recovery from disability in stroke patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available